Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency fluentassertions to v7#276

Merged
ChrisPulman merged 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/fluentassertions-7.x
Jan 20, 2025
Merged

chore(deps): update dependency fluentassertions to v7#276
ChrisPulman merged 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/fluentassertions-7.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jan 19, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
FluentAssertions (source) 6.12.0 -> 7.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

fluentassertions/fluentassertions (FluentAssertions)

v7.0.0

Compare Source

What's Changed
Breaking Changes
Fixes
Documentation
Others
New Contributors

Full Changelog: fluentassertions/fluentassertions@6.12.2...7.0.0

v6.12.2

Compare Source

What's Changed
Others

Full Changelog: fluentassertions/fluentassertions@6.12.1...6.12.2

v6.12.1

Compare Source

What's Changed
Improvements
  • Improve BeEmpty() and BeNullOrEmpty() performance for IEnumerable<T>, by materializing only the first item - #​2530
Fixes
  • Fixed formatting error when checking nullable DateTimeOffset with BeWithin(...).Before(...) - #​2312
  • BeEquivalentTo will now find and can map subject properties that are implemented through an explicitly-implemented interface - #​2152
  • Fixed that the because and becauseArgs were not passed down the equivalency tree - #​2318
  • BeEquivalentTo can again compare a non-generic IDictionary with a generic one - #​2358
  • Fixed that the FormattingOptions were not respected in inner AssertionScope - #​2329
  • Capitalize true and false in failure messages and make them formattable to a custom BooleanFormatter - #​2390, #​2393
  • Improved the failure message for NotBeOfType when wrapped in an AssertionScope and the subject is null - #​2399
  • Improved the failure message for BeWritable/BeReadable when wrapped in an AssertionScope and the subject is read-only/write-only - #​2399
  • Improved the failure message for ThrowExactly[Async] when wrapped in an AssertionScope and no exception is thrown - #​2398
  • Improved the failure message for [Not]HaveExplicitProperty when wrapped in an AssertionScope and not implementing the interface - #​2403
  • Improved the failure message for [Not]HaveExplicitMethod when wrapped in an AssertionScope and not implementing the interface - #​2403
  • Changed BeEquivalentTo to exclude private protected members from the comparison - #​2417
  • Fixed using BeEquivalentTo on an empty ArraySegment - #​2445, #​2511
  • BeEquivalentTo with a custom comparer can now handle null values - #​2489
  • Ensured that nested calls to AssertionScope(context) create a chained context - #​2607
  • One overload of the AssertionScope constructor would not create an actual scope associated with the thread - #​2607
  • Fixed ThrowWithinAsync not respecting OperationCanceledException - #​2614
  • Fixed using BeEquivalentTo with an IEqualityComparer targeting nullable types - #​2648

Full Changelog: fluentassertions/fluentassertions@6.12.0...6.12.1


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@ChrisPulman ChrisPulman merged commit e85707b into main Jan 20, 2025
@ChrisPulman ChrisPulman deleted the renovate/fluentassertions-7.x branch January 20, 2025 08:27
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Feb 4, 2025

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions github-actions Bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 4, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant